我的关系性的自体心理学
Judith Guss Teicholz 2017-6-30
老垓蕤 翻译
References 参考文献
Aron，L. (1996)* A Meeting of Minds, The Analytic Press3 Hillsdale, NJ.
Bacal, & Herzog, B. (2003). Specificity theory and optimal responsiveness: An outline. PsychoanaL P’schol’s 20,635-648.
Beebe’s B, (2005). Mother-infant research informs mother- infant treatment. Psychoanalytic Study of the Ckildy 60’s 7-46.
Beebe’s & Lachmanns E (1988a)- Mother-infant mutual influence and precursors of psychic structure. In A, Goldberg (Ed.)? Frontiers in Self Psychology: Progress in Self Psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 3-26}* The Analytic PresSj Hillsdak, NJ.
BenjaminjJ, (1988). The Bonds of Love: P’schoanalysis, Fern- inismj and tke Problem of Domination. Pantheon, New York,
Bromberg, E (1996), Standing in the spaces; The multiplicity of self and the psychoanalytic relationship, Contemp, Psfchoanalt 32’s 509-535.
Emde’s R, (1990). Mobilizing fundamental modes of development: Empathic availability and therapeutic ac’s tion,J, Amen PsychoanaL Assn.y 383 881-914.
Hoffman, L (1996). The intimate and ironic authority of the psychoanalyst's presence* PsychoanaL 65’s 102-
136.
Kandelj E,(2005). Psychiatry Psychoanalysis’s and the New Btology of Mind, Psychiatry PublishiBgjWashingtoiij DC,
Kohut? H, (1959). Introspectionj empathy, and psycho- analysis, Amer, P’sckoanaL Assn’s 7? 459-483’s
Kohutj H. (1966), Forms and transformations of narcissism. J. Amen PsychoanaL Assn.y 14y 243-271.
Kohutj H, (1971). The Analysis of ike Self. International Universities Press, New York.
Kohut, H. (1977). Tke Restoration of the Seff. International Universities Pressj New York*
Kohutj H. (19B2). Introspection, empathy’s and the semicircle of mental health. Internat J, P’spcko-AnaL, 63> 395407.
Kohut, H. (1984). In; A. Goldberg & K Stepansky (Eds.’s How Does Analysis Cure? University of Chicago Press5 Chicago.
Lichtenberg, J. (1989)* Psychoanalysis and Motivation. The Analytic Press, Hillsdale, Nf,
Lyons-Ruthj K. (1999). Two-person unconscious; Inter- subjective dialogue, enactive relational representa- tiorij and the emergence of new forms of relational organization. P’sckmmL QumLy 576-617-
Mitchell, S. (1997). h’sluence and Autonomy in Psychoanalysis. The Analytic Press, Hillsdale, NJ.
Sander’s L. (2002). Thinking difFerendy: Principles of process in living systems and the specificity of being known. PsychoanaL Dial’s 12y\ 1™42*
Schorej A. (2003a). Affect Reflation and tke Repair of tke Self, W.W. Norton, New York.
Schorej A. (2003b), Ajfect Dpsregulation and Disorders of the Self. W W Norton’s New York.
Stolorow, R., Brandchaftj B., & Atwood’s G. {1987), Psychoanalytic Treatment: An Intersubjective Approach. The Analytic Press5 Hillsdale, NJ.
Teicholz3J. (1995), Loewald's ‘spositive neutrality59 and the affirmative potential of Psychoanalytic interventions. PsychoanaL Study of ike Child’s 50t 48-75.
TeichoIZjJ. (1996). Optimal responsiveness: Its role in psychic growth and change. In L* Lifson (Ed,)? Understanding Therapeutic Action: Psychodynamic Aspects of Cure (pp, 139-161). The Analytic Press> Hillsdale, NJ.
Teichoiz’s J> (1998), Self and relationship: Kohu’s Loe- wald3 and the postmoderns- In A. Goldberg (Ed,)? The World of Self Psychology: Progress in Seif Psychology (Vo!. 14, pp. 267-292), The Analytic Press, Hills- dale 厚
Teichobj J. (1999)* Kohut, Loewald’s & the Postmodems: A Comparative Study of Se’sAnd Relationship, The Analytic Press, HiUsdale, NJ.
TeichoIz? J- (2000). The analyst's empathy, subjectivity and :::authenticity: Affect as the common denominator. In A, Goldberg {EdOs How Responsive Should We Be: Progress In Self Psychology (VoL 16> pp, 33™53). The Analytic Press5 Hillsdale, NJ.
Teicholz, J. (2001). The many meanings of intersubjectivity and their implications for analyst self-expression and self-disclosure. In A, Goldberg (Ed-}5 The Narcissistic Patient Remited: Progress in Self Psychology (Vol* 11 ‘s pp. 9-42)’s The Analytic Press, HiilsdalCj Nj, Teicholz, J. (2006)* Qualities of engagement and the analyses theoiy. IJPSP’s ly 47-77.
TeicholZj J, (2007). A strange convergence: Infant re- search’s postmodern theory and the psychoanalytic unconscious. Beriin. Sdbstpsyckokgie (Berlin),, 29/30> 263-285.
Toipin, M. (2003). Doing psychoanalysis of normal development: Forward edge transferences. In A. Goldberg (Ed,), Progress in Seif Psychology (VoL 19, pp. 167-190). The Analydc Press? Hillsdale； NJ,
Tronickj E, (2003). Of course all relationships are unique: How co-creative processes generate unique mother- infant and patient-therapist reiatiomhips and change other relationships- P矽choanal Inq” 25, 473- 492.
Trop’s J.j & Stolorow’s R- (1992), Defense analysis in self psychology: a developmental view* Psychoaml Dial’s 2, 427-44L
Winnicot’s D, (1960a), Ego distortion in terms of true and false seif. In The Maturational Processes and the Facilitating Enmonmmt (pp. i 40-152). ! 965 * International Universities Press> New York.
Wiimic〇tt5 D. (1960b). The theory of the pareut-iafant relationship. In The Maturational Processes and the Facilitating Environment (pp. 377—355}? i965. International Universities Press, New York.