A Perspective on Judgment and Choice
作者: Daniel Kahneman / 7094次阅读 时间: 2012年9月01日
来源: American Psychologist 标签: Kahneman
www.psychspace.com心理学空间网心理学空间 }4o{A0T9c

A Perspective on Judgment and Choice

d$DI^7~:d-^^0心理学空间g(hnx#DI/P!M,}(Q

Mapping Bounded Rationality

zE/R Ae%g5H`0心理学空间bGg(y;JN*u

Daniel Kahneman

/Ku/Mv \{0

]U Vja2jeY;qH0Princeton University心理学空间~%wFXHCc

心理学空间M(FIoJe

心理学空间fb1g0`YC

%jpy;UFU0p'u0SUMMARY

S | \;Vt1eTtV0

Er6J7G yo,M0Early studies of intuitive judgment and decision makingconducted with the late Amos Tversky are reviewed in thecontext of two related concepts: an analysis of accessibility, the ease with which thoughts come to mind; a distinction between effortless intuition and deliberate reasoning.Intuitive thoughts, like percepts, are highly accessible. Determinants and consequences of accessibility help explainthe central results of prospect theory, framing effects, theheuristic process of attribute substitution, and the characteristic biases that result from the substitution of nonextensional for extensional attributes. Variations in the accessibility of rules explain the occasional corrections of intuitivejudgments. The study of biases is compatible with a view ofintuitive thinking and decision making as generally skilledand successful.

x'y|\;co W _0心理学空间s;|Ntb7`

http://pages.pomona.edu/~rt004747/lgcs11read/Kahneman03.pdf

+n a1C0CI0www.psychspace.com心理学空间网
TAG: Kahneman
«两个大脑在运转,一个快一个慢 Daniel Kahneman 丹尼尔·卡尼曼
《Daniel Kahneman 丹尼尔·卡尼曼》
A proposal to deal with questions about priming effects»